“Ver
despacio lo que pasa apriesa” – watch out when things happen
too quickly!
Cervantes (referring to the theatre)
Nowadays,
people tend to believe that we humans evolve as swiftly as science does,
and while it is true that some circumstantial behaviours appear or disappear
in response to social changes, many of the ways in which a contemporary
citizen continues to act are practically indistinguishable from those
of his or her equivalent in the Roman Empire. The ‘Classics’
depict precisely those situations which have been repeated almost unchanged
down the years because they are based on impulses which are very slow
to evolve.
An
example of this is the Cervantes light comedy “El Retablo de las
Maravillas” (The Miraculous Altarpiece), in which the fear of
being perceived as being of doubtful lineage, or even of harbouring
Jewish blood, leads people to celebrate and revere something which objectively
does not exist – to proclaim as true that which all of them know
to be a manifest falsehood. In essence nothing has changed. In fact
this story was based on an even older oriental metaphor recreated a
hundred years before Cervantes by Don Juan Manuel in his work “Conde
Lucanor”, which involved a group of scoundrels ‘weaving’
garments that turn out to be invisible to all those who are not of legitimate
birth. This same story appears later in the famous tale by Hans Christian
Andersen “The Emperor’s New Clothes” in which only
the innocence of a child permits the exposure of the evident nakedness
of the Monarch, and of the collective hypocrisy. Two diametrically opposed
morals can be drawn from reading these situations. We can blame those
who set out to cheat and deceive or, on the other hand, we can lay the
responsibility at the door of those who so readily allow themselves
to be taken in, and who thereby contribute to the success of the fraudster.
The false truth is propagated through the most indolent and ignorant
minds in society.
The
media doubtless present us today with large numbers of “retablos”
in which an enormous mass of people believe blindly in these deceptions,
proving once more the idea that “There’s a fool born every
day”. Statistically, of course, this is undeniable – there
are quite a few more idiots today than in Cervantes’ day. Indeed
we find many examples of the most dangerous and obnoxious kind –
the learned idiot whose senseless self-confidence can lead to the worst
disasters imaginable.
I
must also confess to being prey to this senseless self-confidence so
typical of our times, as shown by my reckless daring in trying to rework
Cervantes’ play in order, as we say nowadays, to adapt it to our
times. I beg the genius’ pardon for my temerity: I can only plead
that I have done it to the very best of my ability.
I
have set out to find a way that allows us to make the leap, in as natural
a manner as possible, from the 16th century to our times, with the aim
of indicating where some of these contemporary “retablos”
are to be found. In this sense, Cervantes’ work was no doubt clear
enough, but since we always tend to believe that our forebears were
not as clever as us, I have chosen to sketch some of these “retablos”
in a fair amount of detail to call into question such a lightweight
vision of history.
My
initial intention was to construct something based on the magnificent
story by Jerzy Kosinski “Being there”, a tale that also
inspired the script of that splendid Peter Sellers film of the same
name. The story involves a simpleton who, through a chain of confusions
and mistakes, ends up as President of the United States. It is true
that, in the past, the systems of succession used by Royalty and the
members of the Nobility sometimes threw up very similar cases in which
a mean or foolish man could attain a tyrannical level of power. But
today these situations, far from diminishing in frequency, in fact occur
much more often owing to the growing influence of the media, capable
of an unprecedented collective ‘dumbing down’. In this context,
the least qualified person can be dubbed a genius or elevated to the
status of ruler by the fervour of the masses and the legitimacy that
democracy confers.
However,
while in Kosinski’s work it is the mistakes that propel the rise
of the fool, my intention was also to hold responsible those who extol
or calmly accept such a situation. Thus I found that the simple plot
of “El retablo de las maravillas” was closer to meeting
my needs. Seen in this light, and to better direct the story line to
this end, I decided that not only the stories arising from the altarpiece
would form the heart of the deception but also that the altarpiece itself
would be invisible, much like the cloth of the rascally tailors in the
story of “Conde Lucanor”. Then I also changed to victims
of the trick from being village dwellers to an aristocratic couple whose
only child, who is weak in the head, is a cause of despair to his parents.
The confidence tricksters, seeing this, exploit the situation and show
the parents, through the altarpiece, how in the future similarly retarded
people will be taken for a Saint, a genius or even an Emperor.
This
then is the starting point which paves the way for the creation of a
Cervantine parable. The play then makes the leap to our time, though
without losing sight completely of the past thanks to the various 16th
century characters who are shown in their contemporary form. It is clear
that the modern-day society is much given to the creation of many, many
“retablos”, with millions of naive or gullible people more
than willing to applaud stupidly. We have simply portrayed some of the
most evident examples, avant-garde art, experimental cooking, religion
and politics, though in fact there is an enormous range to choose from.
In short, the only thing that marks the difference between today and
the times of Cervantes, is that were he to be alive today, that literary
genius would not have had enough time to satirise all the stupidity
that has been lauded and subsidised by the tax-payer.
Albert
Boadella